For a year and a half I had been waiting for that moment.
Ever since the first trailer was posted on YouTube, I was very impatiently
waiting to yet again see that red cape fly across the screen in a blur, and to
watch one of the greatest heroes the world has ever known fight for Truth,
Justice, and the American Way, and dazzle us all. And with hat, I was eagerly
standing outside of my local theater waiting to watch Man of Steel, a reboot of the ever beloved Superman franchise directed by Zack Snyder, who incase you didn’t
know (which I don’t blame you if you didn’t) directed 300 the entertaining-yet superficial action thriller that is
responsible for all of the Gerard Butler memes scattered across the internet.
Now that I’ve provided a little context, it is time to dive deep into the
could-have-been film that is Man of
Steel.
I really wanted to like this movie. No – strike
that. I really wanted to love this
movie. A modern, darker twist on my favorite superhero of all-time (which
worked wonders with the Batman
series), written by the guy who wrote the story of my favorite movie of all
time, The Dark Knight, and topped off
with an all-star cast sprinkled with the likes of Russell Crowe and Kevin
Costner- I mean, what could go wrong? Well it turns out, a lot could, and it
did.
Let’s just start off with the basics.
Superman (Henry Cavill), or “Kal” as is ever so affectionately called in this
film, was born in a far off galaxy on a far off planet called Krypton. After realizing
the imminent doom of their planet, his parents, Jor-El (Russell Crowe) and Lara
(Ayelet Zurer) decide the only hope for their planet is to save their infant
son from its destruction and send him to a planet called Earth. When he arrives
via mini spaceship his birth parents build him, Kal, or Clark ,
or Kal-El, or CK, or Mr. Kent, or- whatever you would prefer to call him, he
crash lands in a podunk little town called Smallville, Kansas. After living in
Smallville for most of his life, Clark
eventually realizes he must fulfill his destiny and become the savior the Earth
so desperately needs and blah, blah, blah you know the rest.
SPOLIERS
So this is obviously a reboot of the
series, so they should be accorded some breathing room to tweak and change
Superman’s origin story to give it a different and edgier feeling, and there’s nothing
wrong with that. But they did not tweak the
story so to speak. They took it, put it in a blender, ran it over with a
semi-truck, sacrificed it during a voodoo ritual, and buried it at sea. I will
give them some credit, however. I really liked the fact that they made Kal the
last natural birth on his home world, literally making him, “The Last Son of
Krypton”. One other thing is how he exiled himself from Smallville and all he
knew, not to learn how to be superman, but just to try and find who he really
was. It gave a more robust and imperfect view on Superman.
And let’s move on to the elephant in
the room: the no longer existent secret identity of Clark
Kent, aka Superman, aka Kal. They undermined 73 years of comic book, film, and
television cannon and threw a magical twist in there that super reporter Lois
Lane (Amy Adams) magically discovered that Clark Kent was Superman. How, you
ask? I really have no idea. After seeing a mysterious man in a crashed alien
craft in the Arctic (which turned out to be a sad excuse for Superman’s Fortress of Solitude) with her amazing
superpower of photographic memory to remember exactly what Henry Cavill’s looks
like, Lois Lane goes on a quest to discover who that mysterious hunk was. It
depicts her finding and talking to all the people he has allegedly come into
contact with Clark the past, and traced him
back to the whole-in-the-wall that is Smallville. My question is simple: if
Clark was so hell-bent on escaping his old life, don’t you think he would have
never told anyone he was from Smallville, let alone Kansas ? And here’s another good question,
wouldn’t Lois completely forget everything when they kissed? Or was that plot
point conveniently forgotten as well, just like the plot itself?
Speaking of Lois Lane , was I the only one who thinks
that the entire film could have gone without her character at all? Throughout
the entire film, Lois was there, whether it was gaining access to a top-secret
military site, or sitting in the co-pilot’s chair as a C-17 barreled toward an
alien craft ready to drop a bomb made of who-knows-what on it, Lois Lane,
reporter-extraordinaire was on the case. So as I was saying, her character
served quite literally no purpose in this film, except to be the one of the
only people Superman actually saves. The entire film could have functioned just
fine without her throughout, and they just could have dropped her in that final
scene at the Daily Planet. Speaking of which, how did Clark
manage to land a job at the Daily Planet in this economy without any degree or
prior experience in the journalism field? I digress.
And then there’s the scene with the
tornado. Oh how I despise this scene and whoever wrote it. Yes, it is the scene
in which Jonathon Kent (Kevin Costner bravely sacrificed his life in order to
protect his son’s secret from the world, which will be exposed anyway by Lois Lane . Or as
Jonathan Kent would put it “In the ultimate dick of a father move, let me
commit suicide just to prove my point that you shouldn’t tell people about your
powers yet.” That scene made me so mad. It was just moronic. Why didn’t Clark just run to the other side of the overpass and run
at superspeed to grab Jonathan and make it look like the wind did it? Makes too
much sense? Got it.
One more thing that really bothered
me is the way they portrayed Superman’s home world, Krypton. Instead of making
it a hi-tech, crystal-based, futuristic Utopia, they made it look like the
planet Naboo from Star Wars. I’m
almost convinced they had J.J. Abrams in charge of the computer-generated
effects during those scenes so he could test what Star Wars Episode Seven: Revenge of the Mouse will look like.
I’m going to lightly touch on the
last third of the film: movie, you aren’t The
Avengers, the battle didn’t work, and frankly, you’re trying too hard, get
over it.
Moving on
In this film, they attempted to make
a darker, more rustic take on Superman. Well what we got was a plot-hole ridden
snore-fest with no character development whatsoever. What they should have done
was create a film where the world as a whole was the dark part and Superman was
the pure light that guided it back from the brink, not a dark film with dark
characters and a dark plot. Honestly at this point, a line-for-line remake of
the 1978 film in modern times would have been more satisfying. And I hate to
say it, but I enjoyed Superman Returns more
than I did this movie. It’s really a shame, they had a perfect cast with this
film, and Henry Cavill would have done a great job if he was given the proper
script, and director, but just like Christopher Nolan’s choice of director,
this film falls short of greatness.